• About ONE
  • Contact
ONE Only Natural Energy
  • Home
  • Policy & Strategy
  • Climate Change
  • Nature & Environment
  • Innovation
  • Biomass
  • Fossil Fuels
  • Geothermal
  • Nuclear
  • Renewables
  • Issues
Hot Topics
  • January 23, 2021 | EU countries agree to ‘rapidly upscale’ hydrogen market
  • January 19, 2021 | What Joe Biden’s US election victory means for climate change
  • January 17, 2021 | Warmer climate and Arctic sea ice in a veritable suicide pact
  • January 15, 2021 | Are forests the new coal? Global alarm sounds as biomass burning surges
  • January 13, 2021 | The plastic myth and the misunderstood triangle
  • January 11, 2021 | Hydrogen: where is low-carbon fuel most useful for decarbonisation?
  • January 9, 2021 | Wildfires’ toxic air leaves damage long after the smoke clears
  • January 7, 2021 | Climate literacy is essential for effective change
  • January 5, 2021 | China’s new carbon neutrality pledge: what next?
  • January 1, 2021 | Ring out the old, ring in the new
Home News & Comments Climate Change

Scientists honing new ways to measure a city’s carbon footprint

TOPICS:Boston Universitycarbon dioxide emissionscarbon footprintHutyraplant inventoriesProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSargentsensorsurban fossil fuel useWofsy

Posted By: Yale Climate Connections November 27, 2020

Boston may be emerging as a model for how scientists and the public can better quantify and understand their city’s carbon dioxide emissions.

Millions of stacks and tailpipes in cities around the world send up 70 percent of the carbon dioxide ejected into the atmosphere by human beings. And in the parts of the world, including the U.S., where many governments at all levels have offered only anemic or counterproductive responses to the climate crisis, officials in some cities are acting. Four hundred and sixty one mayors, including those of some of the U.S.’s largest cities, have joined Climate Mayors. They’re pledging to uphold the goals of the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement, regardless of whether the U.S. remains in or bolts from that pact.

How can leaders choose carbon-cutting policies with the most impact? And how can they check to see if they’re getting it right?

This past summer, Lucy Hutyra, a climate scientist at Boston University who studies urban fossil fuel use, invited me to see her latest research on tracking carbon dioxide emissions.

I bicycled over to BU Beach, an oasis of green on the highly urban university campus. Above her, Barry Logan, her colleague, balanced on a step ladder poked into the canopy of a linden tree. He pressed single serrated leaves against a soda-straw-thin metal tube, its tip sharpened like a leather punch. He shook a green plug of vegetation out of the tool and folded it inside a thumbnail of tinfoil. Hopping down from the ladder, he dropped the Lilliputian sample into a fuming tank of liquid nitrogen, 320 degrees Fahrenheit below zero.

Along with Logan, a plant physiologist, two other researchers had come along with Hutyra on that blistering August day. They sampled several trees in the park. They’d swathed in bubble wrap and strapped a device that measures sap flow to the trunk of a mature tree. And they’d deployed a little humor in the hopes of deterring would-be vandals. “Please wood you leaf the research alone,” implored a sign on the tree.

Hutyra’s research is part of a wide-ranging campaign to improve estimates of fossil fuel emissions exhaled from the world’s cities measured through time. By coincidence, Boston Mayor Marty Walsh, whose office is a few miles east of BU Beach, co-chairs Climate Mayors. His administration has made an ambitious commitment to make Boston carbon neutral by 2050. Hutyra’s research could help Boston, and any other city, determine if it has succeeded. The political commitments produce physical results, she said. “If you have the state and city governments making pledges to reach carbon neutrality, it should be actualized in the atmosphere.” Then she added with a smile, “and we can measure that.”

Precise sensor atop Boston skyscraper gets CO2 readings each minute

Steven Wofsy, a Harvard atmospheric scientist, is collaborating with Hutyra to hone a technique to make such measurements. Boston is also a test bed for him. He takes air samples 700 feet above the downtown’s swankiest shopping district.

In 2012, Wofsy installed a precision gas sensor atop one of Boston’s tallest skyscrapers, near Copley Square in downtown. It has since recorded the amount of carbon dioxide in the air, once each minute. He put five such detectors in a network, three on the far edge of the metro area, sampling background levels, to the north, south, and west.

Wofsy has hired a colleague’s former grad student, Maryann Sargent, to perfect a method for tracking urban fossil fuel using his sensors’ measurements. She simulates carbon dioxide flowing through the city’s skies by conducting a virtual experiment. She hypothesizes that at some specific time and day, 1,000 infinitesimal parcels of air drift into the downtown detector. Call that time zero. Then, in the simulated place that she calls “model world,” Sargent turns the clock backward one minute from the start of the experiment. Using actual wind records, she calculates where the parcels were from at that earlier time. And she determines how much carbon dioxide they must have borne then.

Like an Agatha Christie sleuth who has discovered a body, a murder weapon and a trainload of suspects, Sargent begins her work with the end result and a cast of the characters. One step at a time, to “solve the crime,” she figures out how they converged in the final act. It’s the only way for her to learn where the downtown air came from and what happened to it along the way.

Moving backward in time, Sargent computes how the carbon dioxide content of each air parcel changes in each minute of its reverse travels across the city. In this topsy-turvy, Alice-in-Wonderland scenario, fossil-fuel burning gradually removes carbon dioxide from the parcels. With the time in repeat, plants, which we normally think of as removing carbon dioxide, add it. Sargent uses two inventories of data that Hutyra has created, one tabulating carbon dioxide emissions from Boston’s smokestacks and tailpipes, the other cataloging uptake of carbon dioxide by the city’s vegetation.

Scraping information from databases such as cell phone logs – which record vehicle travel – and utility records – which show building energy use – Hutyra has computed hour-by-hour estimates of emissions within each cell of an imaginary grid of one-kilometer squares overlaying the Boston area. She’s totaled estimates of the exhaust from every building, vehicle and, of course, electricity generating station within every cell.

In the other inventory, Hutyra has tallied plant uptake within each grid cell each hour of daylight (plants don’t perform photosynthesis and take up carbon dioxide at night). Trees cover 27% of Boston’s surface. The percentage increases in the verdant suburbs. Sargent says the databases clearly show that at times urban vegetation substantially reduces the amount of carbon dioxide added to the city’s air. On some sunny days in some parts of Boston, plants take up more carbon than is added by fossil fuels. It would be pointless to simulate carbon dioxide concentrations in a verdant city like Boston, she says, without factoring in plants.

Sampling a linden tree ‘not behaving like a textbook tree’

The day I visited BU Beach, Hutyra was refining her techniques for compiling plant uptake inventories. Among past findings, she has discovered that urban trees absorb twice as much carbon dioxide as the same size trees in a forest, a discovery with serious implications for her calculations. “This tree is not behaving like a textbook tree,” she said, patting the linden they’d sampled. Compared to their forest counterparts, such urban trees get pampered with fertilizer and water.

From a nearby building they’d aimed a specialized camera that helps estimate a plant’s carbon uptake. Logan took his leaf samples, frozen to the point of suspended animation, back to his lab, to compare tried-and-true laboratory methods for gauging leaf absorption of carbon dioxide with data from the newly-devised camera. He says that with more testing, carbon uptake by urban forests might someday be monitored with similar cameras circling on satellites.

Sargent rewinds time backwards in model world, minute by minute, carrying those imaginary parcels in an expanding cloud ever back in time and upwind. For each increment, she computes the amount of carbon dioxide each parcel exchanged with the surface, through the effects of fossil fuel use or plant growth. In time – three to twelve hours depending on wind speed – the imaginary cloud of parcels exits the metro area and passes by the location of one of Wofsy’s rural detectors (which one depends on the wind direction of the simulated day). This is where the model-world experiment ends, a place where the carbon dioxide concentration is largely unaffected by the city.

From military intelligence to climate intelligence

In a 2018 paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Sargent, Hutyra, Wofsy and eight coauthors compared how much carbon dioxide those simulated air parcels lose moving backwards from downtown to the city’s edge (or, equivalently, the difference in carbon dioxide concentration between the two places) with actual measurements from Wofsy’s sensors. The simulated and actual numbers produced by the two methods were almost identical, within 14% of each other. Wofsy says the agreement between the figures proves that the model world closely resembles the real world, showing “our methods are not crazy.”

With these methods, Sargent says, researchers can soon chart urban emission trends anywhere, even absent the painstaking inventories Hutyra tabulated for Boston, with no further boots on the ground: Orbiting carbon dioxide sensors combined with satellite photos will give them what they need.

In the near future when some country claims a city has made emissions reductions to meet obligations under the Paris Climate Agreement, researchers will be able to investigate the assertion, even if they aren’t given data to justify it. Orbiting sensors, once intended for military intelligence alone, will now empower our climate intelligence. With satellite measurements of carbon dioxide concentrations and urban greenery across the city, and with images showing where people live, and the highways network and locations where electricity is generated, regulators could make a crude simulation of how the concentration of carbon dioxide changes across the city, just as Sargent did in Boston … and verify how much carbon dioxide was emitted there.

If satellite readings of the carbon dioxide concentrations they see don’t line up with the claimed emissions reductions, a closer look might be worthwhile. As climate scientists like to say, the atmosphere doesn’t lie.

October 19, 2020
By Daniel Grossman

Originally published by Yale Climate Connections

  •   Bio
  •   Social


  • author's avatar

    By: Yale Climate Connections

    Yale Climate Connections is a nonpartisan, multimedia service providing daily broadcast radio programming and original web-based reporting, commentary, and analysis on the issue of climate change, one of the greatest challenges and stories confronting modern society.

  • author's avatar

    Visit the author’s website

SHARE
TWEET
PIN
SHARE

Related Articles

Rabbits are pet worth considering, as they leave smaller carbon foot prints than dogs or cats.

Articles, Climate Change

Paw-sitive climate change actions for pets


Climate Change, Nature & Environment, News & Comments, Renewables

Apple, Facebook, Google progress toward a green internet, but coal-heavy utilities stand in the way


Climate Change, Nature & Environment

For Cement’s Massive Carbon Footprint, Some Concrete Steps


Innovation, Nature & Environment, News & Comments

The race to make Formula One greener


Last Issue

  • January-March 2021 (ONE)January-March 2021 (ONE)

Articles

Articles Climate Change Policy & Strategy

What Joe Biden’s US election victory means for climate change

Joe Biden’s US election victory has been hailed as a significant turning point in US policy on everything from racial injustice to the Covid-19 pandemic. But there are few areas where the president-elect differs from his predecessor more than climate change, a topic that…

Articles Climate Change

Warmer climate and Arctic sea ice in a veritable suicide pact

Their ‘death spiral’ is a vicious melting-warming feedback, leading to more melting of snow and ice and still more warming, an ongoing cycle. Think of it as a suicide pact on ice – global warming and Arctic sea ice in…

Articles Biomass

Are forests the new coal? Global alarm sounds as biomass burning surges

The forest biomass industry is sprawling and spreading globally — rapidly growing in size, scale, revenue, and political influence — even as forest ecologists and climatologists warn that the industry is putting the planet’s temperate and tropical forests at risk,…

Articles Nature & Environment

The plastic myth and the misunderstood triangle

Of all the plastic we’ve ever produced, only 9% has been recycled. So what happened to all that plastic you’ve put in the recycling bin over the years? Hands up if you grew up thinking that recycling plastic waste is…

Articles Power to X Renewables

Hydrogen: where is low-carbon fuel most useful for decarbonisation?

Is hydrogen the lifeblood of a low-carbon future, or an overhyped distraction from real solutions? One thing is certain – the coal, oil and natural gas which currently power much of daily life must be phased out within coming decades.…

Articles Nature & Environment

Wildfires’ toxic air leaves damage long after the smoke clears

When researchers arrived in this town tucked in the Northern Rockies three years ago, they could still smell the smoke a day after it cleared from devastating wildfires. Their plan was to chart how long it took for people to…

Articles Climate Change

Climate literacy is essential for effective change

We need to make it easier to understand basic climate science and emissions reductions. We know less than we think we know about climate. And we know even less than that about our carbon footprint. This doesn’t mean we’re all idiots.…

Articles Climate Change Green Tech Sustainability

China’s new carbon neutrality pledge: what next?

Experts react to President Xi’s statement that China will up its climate ambition by striving for carbon neutrality by 2060. In a virtual address to the 75th UN General Assembly on 22 September, Chinese President Xi Jinping said China would…

Articles Innovation Policy & Strategy

Ring out the old, ring in the new

Now is the time to plant the seeds of innovation. The pandemic has been too global and too prolonged to be considered just one of those temporary situations. Better to forget the let’s-get-back-to-2019 prayers. They are filled with hopes of…

Articles Coal Renewables

The green and the black

As the profound global impact of Covid-19 continues to unfold, those whose job it is to forecast the future have had to scramble for their calculators. This has proved just as true for the widely cited projections of global energy…

The Lost Bayou: Grand Bayou

Grand Bayou, LA. At one time, it was a lively community of close-knit families, until they were forced to leave. ©2020. Garde Voir Ci magazine. Nicholls State University Department of Mass Communication.
View More

World Rainforest Day

Rainforests cover only 2 percent of the planet’s surface area but are responsible for more than 25% of all Western medicine and house more than 50% of the world’s plant and animal species.
View More

Plastic litters one of the world's remotest islands - Henderson Island

Plastic litters one of the world's remotest islands - Henderson Island
View More
  • Sitemap
  • Contact
  • TERMS OF USE
  • PRIVACY POLICY

©ONLYNATURALENERGY. All rights reserved.