In the game of tackling climate change, who would be the champion?
By Tan Copsey and Bridgette Burkholder
The World Cup starts today. Billions of people around the world are expected to tune in to the greatest show on earth. Everyone from economists to an octopus have tried to predict who will win. Germany, Brazil and Spain are early favorites to take the cup.
But, which countries are tackling climate change, kicking out fossil fuels, and trying to score a better future? Here’s bracket that predicts the winners.
Working this out is harder than it sounds. How do you judge what makes a champ? One way is simply to look at the greenhouse gas emissions people in each country produce. Nigeria is the per-capita-emissions champions, contributing a tiny 0.55 metric tons green house gasses per person, according to the World Bank. They also have the best shirts in the tournament, as well as one of the cooler songs.
But, like all World Cup winners, their route to victory includes some controversy. They beat Senegal, a West African nation with similarly low emissions, in the semifinal. But energy wonks and Senegalese fans could point to the fact that Nigeria is a major oil exporter and most of the emissions associated with that oil are not included here. Costa Rica, who Nigeria beats in this low-emissions final, is the first and only country in the world that has said it will ban fossil fuels entirely. Some may call foul on declaring Nigeria the victor.
Are per capita emissions the best measure of whether a country is really a climate champion? To decarbonize the economy while improving living standards, deployment of renewable energy may ultimately be more important.
Running the numbers again, this time using International Renewable Energy Agency stats, traditional powerhouses Spain, Germany and Brazil, who have ten titles between them, all made the semifinals. Brazil’s owes its victory to a reliance on hydropower, but as with the team itself — which relies heavily on Neymar — there are some pleasing signs of diversification away from a single source of energy — or goals, as it were.
The agony suffered by American soccer fans, who saw their team miss out on qualification, will be compounded by the fact that this is one World Cup they could have won. The United States has deployed more renewable energy than any country competing this year. Only China has better stats, and the Chinese have only ever qualified for one World Cup.
Fighting climate change isn’t just about greenhouse gas emissions or renewable energy. As in soccer, you have to defend as well as attack. We’ve already seen global temperatures increase by about 1 degree C since the 1880s, and even with serious action, we’re going to see more warming in the decades ahead. So who’s best prepared for climate change? Data from the University of Notre Dame offers the answer.
Unfortunately, our per capita emissions champions were immediately eliminated, along with every African nation present, which should be a wake-up call for some of the richer nations in the tournament, who are supposed to be financing efforts to adapt. Instead, the adaptation World Cup is dominated by small, rich European nations. And even then, it’s a pretty low scoring affair. Most nations simply aren’t ready for climate change.
On top of this worrying news, the next World Cup is scheduled to take place in Qatar, a nation of scorching temperatures and the highest per capita emissions in the world. Qatar has a lot of work to do if it wants to be a World Cup climate champion.
Originally published by Nexus Media